Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Lewis

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1987No. C000114PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Defendant Karen Lewis (Karen) appeals from a judgment declaring that plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) has no duty under a homeowner’s insurance policy to defend or indemnify the estate of her late husband, Wesley Lewis (Wesley), either for injuries Karen sustained or for the wrongful deaths of the Lewis’s two minor children.

On appeal Karen concedes the policy excludes coverage for her own physical bodily injuries. She contends, however, that the policy’s exclusionary clause does not unambiguously exclude coverage for her children’s wrongful deaths…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CockingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Barrows v. American Family InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API