Legal Opinion

Lawrence Barker, Inc. v. Briggs

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1952No. L. A. 21947PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff, Lawrence Barker, Inc., recovered judgment entitling it to immediate possession of certain real property leased by it to defendant, Walter M. Briggs. The judgment provided that defendant was not entitled to take anything by reason of his counterclaim and that he was not entitled to a declaratory judgment by reason of his cross-complaint. Plaintiff recovered costs and attorney’s fees. *656The lease involved in the controversy was entered into on January 1, 1945, for a 10-year term by Lawrence Barker, Inc., as lessor, and Walter M. Briggs, as lessee. The lease covered premises consisting…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Judd v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Grommes v. St. Paul Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Tanzola v. De RitaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Kwok v. BergrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Nevada National Bank v. HuffNevada Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API