Legal Opinion
Yates v. Reid
California Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1950No. L. A. 21382PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from that portion of the judgment that he take nothing from the defendants on his complaint for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the defendants’ abandonment of a lease. The defendants have appealed from that portion of the judgment that they take nothing on their cross-complaint. The latter appeal has not been prosecuted and will be dismissed.
The plaintiff leased a tourist resort to the defendants for a term beginning October 15, 1945, and ending January 14, 1950. The defendants agreed to pay a rental of $300 per month for the first three months…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Rognier v. HarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atkinson v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Grueninger Travel Service of Fort Wayne, Indiana, Inc. v. Lake County Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lawrence Barker, Inc. v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cochise Hotels, Inc. v. Douglas Hotel Operating Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.