Legal Opinion

Clover Manufacturing Co. v. Austin Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 11, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

Appellant pursues reasons of appeal six to eleven inclusive. The questions thus raised are whether the Superior Court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s remonstrance to the report of the State Referee in the particulars pointed out in an amendment to the reasons of appeal filed March 24th, 1924, and in rendering judgment for the defendant upon its counterclaim and cross-complaint.

Reason of appeal six is that the court erred in overruling paragraph B-l of the plaintiff’s remonstrance, to the effect that the report should not be accepted for the reason apparent on its face that “on page 17,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Loughlin v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  2. George S. Chatfield Co. v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Beattie v. McMullenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Lenox Construction Co. v. Colonial Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. John T. Brady & Co. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Kelsall v. KelsallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Hartford Electric Applicators of Thermalux, Inc. v. AldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Grenier v. Compratt Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API