Legal Opinion

Beattie v. McMullen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 17, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by a subcontractor to recover for alleged extra work and material, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Ralph Wheeler, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs for 131,516, and appeal by the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The plaintiffs are engaged in the business of quarrying, preparing and dressing stone; the defendants are contractors in bridge building. The Connecticut River Bridge and Highway District is a public corporation, created by the legislature of this State for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a public bridge across the Connecticut River at Hartford, and acting by a board of commissioners.

In July, 1903, the Bridge and Highway District, by its board of commissioners, entered into a written contract with the defendants for the construction of a bridge, to be about 1,185 feet in length,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. O'Keefe v. Corporation of St. Francis's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. Healy v. FallonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  5. Korf v. LullIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Willard Shopping Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. George S. Chatfield Co. v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Clover Manufacturing Co. v. Austin Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Maskel Construction Co. v. Town of GlastonburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Sellew v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API