Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Leary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 1982No. WCB 80-01939, CA A23101PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed a referee’s order holding his occupational disease claim compensable. The dispositive issue is whether claimant’s physical disabilities arose out of and in the scope of his employment. ORS 656.802(1)(a). We review de novo, ORS 656.298(6), and reverse.

Claimant, age 54 at the time of the hearing, had been employed by Pacific Northwest Bell (PNB) for 33 years installing and repairing telephones. In December, 1977, he began experiencing headaches, upset stomach and diarrhea. At the hearing he testified that he was under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Maddox v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rallis v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  3. Leary v. Pacific Northwest BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Petersen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API