Legal Opinion

Leary v. Pacific Northwest Bell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 18, 1984No. 80-01939; CA A23101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This case was remanded by the Supreme Court, 296 Or 139, 675 P2d 157 (1983), to apply the objective standard of McGarrah v. SAIF, 296 Or 145, 675 P2d 159 (1983). 1 In our former opinion, 60 Or App 459, 465, 653 P2d 1293 (1982), we stated that “notwithstanding that his work-related. stress appears largely to be his own reaction to his working conditions * * * we conclude that it is the major contributing cause of his disability and that it is therefore compensable.” Our conclusion was based on a subjective test that was rejected by the Supreme Court in McGarrah.

In Elwood v. SAIF, 67 Or App…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Foley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Elwood v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Leary v. Pacific Northwest BellOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adsitt v. Clairmont Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Petersen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Duran v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Petersen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Petersen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API