Legal Opinion

Barnett v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 30, 2016No. CIVIL NO. JKB-16-406PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

James K. Bredar, United States District Judge

Stephen F. Barnett (“Plaintiff’), a citizen of Maryland, brought a negligence action against the United States of America (the “Government”) pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA” or the “Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671 et seq., seeking compensation for injuries he sustained when he tripped and fell on a public sidewalk in the vicinity of the Baltimore-Washington Science and Industry *517Center. Plaintiff named as additional Defendants Anne Arundel County, Maryland (the “County”); Brit Limited Partnership d/b/a Beco Management,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Duncan-Bogley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  2. Hobbs v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  3. Abney v. Federal Correctional Institution McDowellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  4. Adeyemi v. GarlandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  5. Akpa v. Frederick Health HospitalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API