Legal Opinion
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 23, 2005No. 04-70PublishedCited by 2,774 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
These consolidated cases present the question whether a federal court in a diversity action may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over additional plaintiffs whose claims do not satisfy the minimum amount-in-controversy requirement, provided the claims are part of the same case or controversy as the claims of plaintiffs who do allege a sufficient amount in controversy. Our decision turns on the correct interpretation of 28 U. S. C. § 1367. The question has divided the Courts of Appeals, and we granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 543 U. S. 924 (2004).
We hold that, where the other…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,774 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
2,769 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.