Legal Opinion

Adeyemi v. Garland

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 3, 2025No. 1:24-cv-02544Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SEGUN BOAZ ADEYEMI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil No.: 1:24-cv-02544-JRR PAMELA JO BONDI, et al.,1 Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending now before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 12; the “Motion.”) Plaintiffs did not respond to the Motion. No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2025). I. Background2 Pro se Plaintiffs Segun Boas Adeyemi and Amber S. Rogers3 initiated this action against Defendants Merrick B. Garland, as Attorney General of the United States, Alejandro Mayorkas, as Secretary of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. Jerome Williams v. Jon OzmintCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Velasco v. Government of IndonesiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API