Legal Opinion
Langley v. Ford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 6, 1917No. 7392PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTiardx, J.
E. E. Ford, as plaintiff, commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage upon certain lands theretofore comprising a portion of the allotment of Matilda Sarali Langley, a Choctaw Indian minor, which mortgage had been .executed to secure a note of $1,000, representing 'the commission for a loan made by the Deming' Investment Company on said premises. The defendants James T. and Lula Rouark filed an answer in which they alleged that the guardian’s deed' executed by Samuel L. Langley, guardian of said minor, to one Hays, and the conveyance from said Hays to Caleie Lee Langley, mother of said minor,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Loring v. BrodieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Jones v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Glory v. BagbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Kingkade v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.