Legal Opinion

Munn v. Mid-Continent Motor Securities Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 1924No. 12925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced in the district count of Tulsa county, Okla., by Maude B. Munn and M. J. Munn, plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against the Mid-Continent Motor Securities ‘Company, defendant in error, defendant .below for the recovery of $4,585.-50, double the amount claimed, to have been withheld by the defendant in error in violation iof the usury statute of this state, together with reasonable attorneys’ fees and their costs. The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as they appeared in the lower court. '

Plaintiffs, in their petition,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Sartain v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Citizens' National Bank v. DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Eaker v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Clark v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Gooldy v. J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Munn v. Mid-Continent Motor Securities Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Shoenfelt v. Donna Belle Loan & Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API