Legal Opinion
Schrillo Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1986No. Docket Nos. B009207, B009416PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
Introduction
Cross-complainant Schrillo Company (Schrillo) appeals from the superior court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment brought by cross-defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford). Schrillo had filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief against Hartford which, on the grounds of lack of coverage, had declined to defend or indemnify Schrillo in a separate action brought by a third party against Schrillo. We affirm.
Background
Schrillo, principally a manufacturer of components used in the fabrication and assembly of aircraft parts,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Nichols v. Great American Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Chamberlin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Titan Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Dyer v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hallmark Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LongdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Smith Kandal Real Estate v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.