Legal Opinion
Smith Kandal Real Estate v. Continental Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1998No. D028511PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
Smith Kandal Real Estate (Smith Kandal), a partnership, is a real estate broker insured for the years 1994 and 1995 under real estate agents’ errors and omissions liability policies issued by Continental Casualty Company (Continental). Michael and Deirdre Morgan (the Morgans) served a draft complaint on Smith Kandal, seeking damages incurred in a real estate transaction in which Smith Kandal was the broker for the Morgans. Smith Kandal tendered to Continental the defense of the Morgans’ claim. Continental rejected the tender, asserting that because of “Exclusion O” and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Powerine Oil Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- County of San Diego v. Ace Property & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Frontier Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Essex Insurance v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.