Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Donohoe

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1922No. Sac. No. 3308PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Supersedeas to stay execution pending appeal directed to the Superior Court of Glenn County. J. E. Prewett and H. C. Bell, Judges. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an application by the defendants for a writ of supersedeas to prevent the issuance of a general execution as on a money judgment pending the appeal. The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants for an accounting of partnership profits and to have it adjudged that the title of certain real estate was held in trust by the defendants for the partnership. The defendants denied the existence of a copartnership, but the court found the facts to be as alleged by the plaintiff, ordered an accounting, and thereafter entered its findings and judgment that the plaintiff’s share in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Owen v. Pomona Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Painter v. PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Moran v. McInerneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Downs v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API