Legal Opinion

Huber v. Hemrich Brewing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1936No. 26084. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLARD, C.J., and HOLCOMB, J., dissent. This action grows out of a collision between an automobile, driven by plaintiff, with a truck, owned by the defendant. The collision occurred shortly after twelve o'clock midnight, at the intersection of Olive way and Westlake avenue, Seattle. Olive way runs east and west; Westlake avenue takes a northerly and southerly course. The streets do not, however, intersect at right angles. Coming from the south, Fifth avenue runs into Westlake avenue just south of Olive way. From the north, Fifth avenue runs into Westlake right at Olive way. We thus have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. McAllister v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adkisson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Chadwick v. EkWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Tobias v. RainwaterWashington Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API