Legal Opinion

Sailing v. Wallestad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The appeal presents these issues:(1) Does the credible evidence support the finding that the defendants were 65 percent negligent and the plaintiffs 35 percent negligent?(2) Did the trial court err in refusing to instruct the jury that defendant Wallestad could assume that the plaintiff Sailing would yield the right-of-way to him?(3) Did the trial court err in failing to give an instruction on plaintiff Sailing’s negligence with regard to management and control?(4) Did the trial court err in admitting testimony regarding the issuance and dismissal of a traffic ticket?

The major issue of this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baumgarten v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McCauley v. International Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Schumacher v. KlabundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Papacosta v. PapacostaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Maus v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bishop v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Werner Transportation Co. v. BartsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API