Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Plaintiff seeks a new trial on the following grounds:

1. The apportionment of negligence is contrary to the evidence.

2. The trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that the driver of a car approaching an intersection regulated by a flashing red light has a greater duty of lookout than a driver approaching a flashing yellow light.

3. The jury award of $2,000 for pain, suffering and disability was inadequate.

4. The trial court erroneously excluded certain medical bills.

5. The trial court erroneously excluded items of future and past wage loss.

6. In the interest of justice.

7. The trial…