Legal Opinion

Weitzel v. Jukich

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1952No. 7861PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

Respondents, plaintiffs in the trial court, brought this action against appellants (defendants) to recover damages for alleged misrepresentation and deceit, claimed to be fraudulent, which induced the respondents to enter into a lease covering certain real estate.

On November 17, 1949, appellants published an ad in the Spokesman-Review, Spokane, Washington, reading:

“Grade A dairy farm, no stock, modern conveniences: phone electricity, mail, school bus route; good buildings, cut 300 tons hay a year. Samuels, Idaho, phone 17 F3, Sandpoint, Idaho.”

Respondents read the ad and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Nelson v. HoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lanning v. SpragueIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Gridley v. RossIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Rice v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API