Sigafus v. Porter
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
This action was brought to recover damages for deceit alleged to have been practiced by Sigafus, the plaintiff in error, upon Porter, Hobson and Morse, the defendants in error, in the sale by the former to the latter of a gold mine in California, known as the Good Hope Consolidated Gold Lode Mining Claim (consisting of the San Jacinto and Good Hope Quartz locations), and as the Annex, adjoining the Good Hope mine on the south.
The complaint alleged that the defendant Sigafus was. president of the Good Hope Consolidated Gold Mining Company, a corporation of California possessing the legal title…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Buschman v. CoddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Cramer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.