Legal Opinion
Doe v. CUTTER BIOLOGICAL, a DIV. OF MILES INC.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 24, 1994No. Civ. 92-0434-S-HLRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO AMEND
RYAN, Senior District Judge.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Plaintiff John Doe is a hemophiliac. Because of his condition, John Doe received a clotting agent known as Factor VIII which facilitates the clotting of blood in hemophiliacs.
In December of 1991, John Doe tested positive for the HIV virus. On October 30, 1992, John Doe commenced this federal action naming those providers of the Factor VIII products which were administered to him by the Pocatello Regional Medical Center between 1979 and 1985. 1 Originally, the named…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Manning v. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murtha v. CahalanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Strong v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 2005
- Burks v. Bailey (In re Bailey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2013
- Doe v. Miles Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Carbajal v. Hayes Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.