Legal Opinion

Robert O. Gilmore, Jr., and Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, United States of America, Intervenor v. People of the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2000No. 98-15160, 98-15198PublishedCited by 294 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

In these consolidated appeals, we are asked to determine the constitutionality of provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), Pub.L. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321-66 (Apr. 26, 1996), that require termination of prospective relief in prison conditions cases. This is not the first occasion we have had to address the constitutionality of these provisions, 2 nor are we the first circuit to be presented with this question. 3 Although we follow our sister circuits in holding the termination provisions constitutional, we do so on grounds that are at once less…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by294 opinions

  1. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

289 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API