Legal Opinion
Hallett v. Morgan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2002No. 00-35098PublishedCited by 818 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 26, 2002, is amended ás follows:
On slip opinion page 6360 [287 F.3d 1193, 1212], delete:
3. Permissible Sanctions on Remand
On remand, the district court may conclude that Defendants substantially complied with the medical services provisions of the Judgment at, all times relevant to this action.10 However, should the court hold otherwise, it may order only retrospective relief. That is because the consent decree that is the subject of Plaintiffs’ contempt motion expired on January 5, 2000, and is no longer in effect. See Imprisoned Citizens Union v. Ridge, 169 F.3d…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by818 opinions
- Toguchi v. Soon Hwang ChungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lance Jett v. M. Penner, D. Peterson, and Cheryl K. Pliler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
813 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.