Legal Opinion
Harvest v. Castro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 9, 2008No. 05-16879PublishedCited by 291 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
Respondent-appellee’s petition for panel rehearing is granted and the opinion filed March 27, 2008, slip op. 3121, and reported at 520 F.3d 1055, is withdrawn and superseded by an amended opinion, filed concurrently with this order.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. Subsequent petitions for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc may be filed with respect to the amended opinion.
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether and, if so, under what circumstances, a district court has the authority to modify a conditional writ of habeas…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by291 opinions
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- John Doe v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Phelps v. AlameidaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jennings v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.