Legal Opinion

Korchak v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1935No. Civ. 10214PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, J., pro tem.

This action is for personal injuries received by plaintiff when struck by a car of respondent Pacific Electric Railway Company. The court directed a verdict in favor of defendants, and from the judgment entered thereon plaintiff appeals. It was stipulated that plaintiff was guilty of negligence, and that the sole question to be determined was whether or not the doctrine of last clear chance was applicable, entitling the plaintiff to have the cause go to the jury upon that question alone.

The accident occurred in Culver City when appellant was crossing the interurban track…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bagwill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Powell v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Tice v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Folger v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Rather v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API