Tice v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Two judgments are appealed from. Both were in favor of defendants, the two cases having been consolidated for the purposes of tria) before a jury.
*69The actions were based upon the alleged negligence of the defendants—the company and its motorman—in the operation of an electric train upon a private right of way on Venice Boulevard between Los Angeles and Santa Monica. Within the right of way is a double track which crosses the streets and highways between said cities. On the evening of August 4, 1936, about 8:20 o’clock, a Ford automobile, while being driven by Leonard Wright southerly along…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Parmenter v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Parker v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Ineas v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.