Legal Opinion

Folger v. Richfield Oil Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1947No. Civ. 15534PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The question for decision is whether the court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial by reason of its failure to instruct the jury with respect to the doctrine of the last clear chance.

The complaint alleged that while plaintiff was proceeding in his sedan northward on Cherry Avenue in Long Beach at 9 :14 p. m. on December 17, 1944, defendants so negligently operated their 2-ton flat-bed truck as to cause it to collide with plaintiff’s car at the intersection of Wardlow Road, and that as a proximate result of such negligence plaintiff’s automobile was destroyed and he suffered…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Ribble v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Powell v. BartmessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API