Seattle National Bank v. School District No. 40
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Oourt, [Kittitas County.—lion. John B. Davidson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
The amended complaint in this action, omitting the venue, title and verification, reads as follows:
“ Comes now the plaintiff above named, and for cause of action against the defendant above named, alleges:
1. That it is and at all times herein mentioned was a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States, and engaged in a general banking business in the city of Seattle, state of Washington.
2. That the defendant is and at all times herein mentioned was a corporation duly organized and existing…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Starks v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Corbin v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Crandall v. ItenWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Lea v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.