Crandall v. Iten
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
Since a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that there is another action pending between the same parties concerning the same subject-matter, was sustained and the action dismissed, the only question before us is the sufficiency of the complaint. It alleged that, on a day named, the plaintiffs were the owners of certain described real estate, located in Snohomish county, Washington, and the defendants were the owners of certain other real estate, located in Klickitat county, Washington; that, pursuant to an oral…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Kaplan v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Wood v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Sayward v. ThayerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lea v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Munro v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. HargisWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Jansen v. KolmitzWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Green Mountain Lumber Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.