Lea v. Young
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This action was begun in the court below to recover $2,796 alleged to be due and owing to appellants by reason of respondents having rescinded a real estate contract which had existed between the parties.
The complaint alleges that, on April 8, 1929, the parties entered into a written contract whereby respondents agreed to sell and appellants agreed to buy a parcel of real estate in King county for $7,100, of which $2,194 was paid at the time, $3,600 was to be paid by the assumption of a mortgage, and the balance of $1,306 was to be paid in monthly installments; that appellants paid on the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Freeman v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Gibson v. RouseWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Perlus v. SilverWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Thiel v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Nicolopoolos v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- King v. OakleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Marshall v. Estate of ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Alhadeff v. Van SlykeWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Parsons Supply, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Litel v. MarshWashington Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.