Legal Opinion

Farquhar v. Alaska National Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2001No. S-9485PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

«FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Thomas Farquhar was badly injured in a traffic accident with a driver for Industrial Boiler and Controls, Inc. He settled with Industrial Boiler's insurer, Alaska National Insurance Company (ANIC), for Industrial Boiler's policy limit of one million dollars. Farquhar claims that ANIC should be liable for prejudgment interest on the settlement, although such liability would bring ANIC's total payment above its policy limit of one million dollars. We conclude that ANIC's contract did not oblige it to pay prejudgment interest beyond the policy limit.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dairyland Insurance v. DouthatSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  4. Nielsen v. O'REILLYUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. United Cook Inlet Drift Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. TeelAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Coughlin v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Maloney v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Allstate Insurance Companies v. HerronDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2005
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Nathan Harbour, Allstate Insurance Company v. Kenneth N. MattisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API