Nielsen v. O'REILLY
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
Plaintiff Richard H. Nielsen appeals the judgment of the Third Judicial District Court that $250,000 is the maximum recov*665ery possible under the uninsured motorist provision of an insurance policy issued by defendant Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance Co. (“Metropolitan”). We affirm.
The facts of this case are undisputed. Prior to April of 1983, Nielsen purchased an insurance policy from Metropolitan. The policy insured two automobiles owned by Nielsen and was in force at all relevant times. Among other coverages, the policy included uninsured motorist protection…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Dairyland Insurance v. DouthatSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- First American Title Insurance Co. v. J.B. Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. CrookUtah Supreme Court · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.