Allstate Insurance Co. v. Teel
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An insurance policy defined “insured person” as someone legally entitled to recover damages for injury to the occupant of an insured vehicle. The parties dispute whether this provision covers an individual, Monica Foster Teel, who seeks to recover for her own emotional distress resulting from the death of her son, Cory Foster, an occupant of the insured vehicle. The superior court ruled that Teel was an insured person under the provision. Because we conclude that the policy language does not clearly exclude Teel from coverage, we affirm the decision of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hallowell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Bering Strait School District v. RLI Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
- C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- West v. Umialik Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Airlines v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. DowdyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HouleAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. FalgoustAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.