Legal Opinion

Maloney v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2004No. S-10950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Denise Maloney was seriously injured in an auto accident caused by a driver insured by Progressive Specialty Insurance Company. Progressive's policy provided for a maximum payment of $50,000, plus attorney's fees assessed under Alaska Civil Rule 82. Progressive acknowledged liability and damages exceeding the policy's limit-cireumstances that obliged Progressive to give Maloney a policy-limits settlement offer. Progressive offered Maloney the policy's nominal limit but, since Maloney was not represented by counsel, did not offer any additional…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Shearer v. MundtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Progressive Corp. v. Peter Ex Rel. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ahtna Tene Nené v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LestenkofAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LestenkofAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API