Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2015No. S219454; S219819PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

On November 6, 2012, the electorate passed Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (Proposition 36 or the Act). Proposition 36 reduced the punishment to be imposed with respect to some third strike offenses that are neither serious nor violent, and provided for discretionary resentencing in some cases in which third strike sentences were imposed with respect to felonies that are neither serious nor violent.

We granted review to resolve two issues related to the Act’s resentencing provisions. First, in People v. Johnson (S219454), we address for purposes…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. MoralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. ArevaloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API