Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Brookfield

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2009No. S147980PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

— In this case, a companion to People v. Jones (2009) 47 Cal.4th 566 [98 Cal.Rptr.3d 546, 47 Cal.4th 566], we must interpret subdivision (e)(2) of Penal Code section 12022.53 (section 12022.53(e)(2)). That provision states; “An enhancement for participation in a criminal street gang . . . shall not be imposed ... in addition to” an enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.53 for firearm use unless the defendant “personally used or personally discharged a firearm in the commission of the offense.” (Italics added.)

Here, defendant was convicted of a gang-related crime in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. BrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. OatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. PruntyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. Mario Renee PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API