Legal Opinion

Briceno v. Scribner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 2009No. 07-55665PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge MINER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent as to Part III by Judge WARDLAW.

MINER, Circuit Judge:

I. Introduction

Alberto Francisco Briceno appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Morrow, J.) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Briceno was convicted, following a jury trial, of four counts of second degree robbery and four counts of street terrorism in the Superior Court of Orange County. The jury also found that the robberies were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. Briceno pursued…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Klein v. City of San ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. People v. VazquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API