Legal Opinion

Town of Clinton v. Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1946PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

That defendant’s warehouse is so built that by the erection of partitions it can be used for wholesale business establishments may be a fact. Even so, there is nothing in the record to sustain the finding that he erected the building for a dual purpose.

When he obtained a permit to erect a warehouse the designation of Clinton as a tobacco sales market was uppermost in the minds of its people. They, at that time, had cause to feel assured their efforts would be successful. To say that defendant did not have in mind a warehouse to be used for the sale of leaf tobacco would seem to beg the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. City of Chicago v. Gunning SystemIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. City of Rochester v. . GutberlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Mills v. CAROLINA CEMETERY PARK CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Dare County v. MaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. In Re the Custody of DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API