Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

G-69 v. Degnan

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 22, 1990No. Civ. No. 86-3282(SSB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JEROME B. SIMANDLE, United States Magistrate:

This matter is before the court upon motion of the State of New Jersey, as intervenor,1 for a protective order that 63 documents not be disclosed, pursuant to Rule 26(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., claiming a criminal investigative privilege.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

This action is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and pendent state causes of action by an individual, code-named plaintiff G-69, who allegedly acted as a paid informant for the State of New Jersey in its investigation of criminal activities in the casino gaming industry in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  5. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  2. Coker v. Duke & Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  3. Torres v. KuzniaszDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  4. Scott v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  5. Jones v. DeRosaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API