Legal Opinion
Scott v. Board of Education
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 6, 2004No. Civ.A. No. 01-4171(JCL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIGENTON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is a motion for a protective order (the “Motion”) filed by defendants the Board of Education of the City of East Orange (the “Board”); Everett Jennings (“Jennings”), a member of the Board; and Robert Bowser (“Bowser”), the Mayor of the City of East Orange, (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants seek to preclude plaintiff James Scott (“Plaintiff”) from inquiring into the mental impressions and discussions of the members of the Board that contributed to their decision to terminate Plaintiffs employment with the Board, pursuant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mitchell v. FishbeinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Anderson v. Marion County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
- United States v. Lake County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2005
- E.B. v. New York City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.