Legal Opinion
Torres v. Kuzniasz
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 20, 1996No. Civil 95-5778PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KUGLER, United States Magistrate Judge:
Before the court are two motions on behalf of Defendants in the above-referenced case. The first motion is brought before the court by Defendants W. Kuzniasz, D. Vause, George D. Pugh, Edward Eldred, and the City of Camden (“the Camden defendants”) for two forms of relief. First, the Camden defendants seek a modification of this court’s order compelling Camden to produce its Internal Affairs investigations for the years 1988 through 1996. The defendants seek to reduce the time period of the order to two years prior to the incident involving…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tuite v. HenryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Caver v. City of TrentonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Wells Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Merman v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Groark v. TimekDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.