Legal Opinion

Coker v. Duke & Co.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 20, 1998No. CIV.A. No. 97-D-839-NPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARROLL, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 27, 1997, the plaintiffs, Robert L. Coker and Tami L. Coker, filed this action against Duke & Co., Inc., Hanifen Clearing Corp., Scott D. Harris and Paul Owens. Harris was dismissed as a defendant on October 28, 1997. The plaintiffs’ complaint asserts claims for fraud, suppression, deceit, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, violations of the Alabama Securities Act, and the Securities Act of 1934. On November 10, 1997, the plaintiffs served their First Request for Production of Documents on defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Nancy Deitchman, Paula Renfroe, and Dr. Arthur L. Herbst, Witness-Appellee v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  2. Folb v. Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health PlansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  3. Tucker v. Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  4. Rowlin v. Alabama Dep't of Public SafetyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. Marens v. Carrabba's Italian Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API