Legal Opinion

Wright Et Ux v. Hage Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

This is an action brought by Felix T. Wright and Dorothy R. Wright, his wife, doing business as Silver Falls Hatchery, as plaintiffs, against Roy M. Hage and Zelma Hage, his wife, as defendants. The action is upon a promissory note executed by defendants on June 30,1949 in the sum of $2,297 payable to the plaintiffs.

The answer of the defendants admitted the execution of the note and the non-payment thereof but alleged an affirmative defense of recoupment arising out of the transaction in which the note was given. After both parties had rested, the plaintiffs moved for a directed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. American Car Co. v. Atlanta Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Krausse v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Johnson v. FeskensOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Dixon Et Ux v. Schoonover Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Shannon v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lamb v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Jewell v. ComptonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API