Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Young

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiff brought several lawsuits, consolidated for trial, to foreclose stock pledged to secure promissory notes. The notes were given in consideration of plaintiff’s lending money to the defendants to purchase the stock. The trial court, sitting without a Jury, found that the plaintiff had participated in the sale of the stock to the defendants, that the sale was in violation of the Oregon Securities Law because the stock was not registered and, therefore, plaintiff could not recover on the notes or foreclose the stock.

The plaintiff asserts that the defendants were barred by the time…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richard v. SlateOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Land Board v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Rosell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. ApodacaWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bergquist v. International Realty, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Shannon v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API