Legal Opinion

Dixon Et Ux v. Schoonover Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1961PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiffs brought an action for breach of contract against defendants who filed a counterclaim alleging fraud. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants on the counterclaim. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for judgment n.o.v. and denied their motion for a new trial. Both parties appeal.

In October 1954, plaintiffs were buying a dairy farm in Klickitat County, Washington from Delwyn Allaway. After some negotiations, the plaintiffs, on October 29, 1954, entered into a contract to sell their interest in the farm to defendants. As part payment of the purchase price…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Linebaugh v. Portland Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Eastman v. CraryOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Spaur v. McBeeOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. CummingsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Riley v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mathies v. HoeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API