Jewell v. Compton

BOHANNON, J. (Pro Tempore).

In our original opinion we held that on the record before us the trial court’s judgment must be affirmed because the findings of fact supported the judgment. The trial court held that the burden was on the defendants to establish the allegations of their counterclaim and found that:

"Both the value of the services and their application to the note are vigorously disputed, and the Court cannot say that these issues have been established by a preponderance of the evidence.”

This finding cannot be interpreted as a determination that no valuable services by defendants…