Jester v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Subsequent to filing of plaintiff in error’s brief on appeal a suggestion of plaintiff in error’s death and appointment of William Jester as Executor of deceased’s estate was made to this Court. By appro priate order entered thereafter, the cause was ordered revived in the name of William Jester, Executor of the Estate of Ted R. Semler, Deceased. All references to plaintiff, or plaintiff in error, are to be understood as referring to the Executor of the deceased’s estate.
Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, sued to recover damages alleged to have resulted from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Clark v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. BarkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Merrill v. StringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Hamilton v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Bruce Willey TruckingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Deaver v. Missouri Pacific R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.