Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Allen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1993No. 75792PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Chief Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Richard Allen and the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. We find that the trial court correctly entered judgment for the defendants.

The uncontroverted facts submitted by the defendants were not disputed by the plaintiff, Mark Hamilton. Those facts are as follows. High Street is a two lane road which runs north and south. At the scene of the accident, there are two sets of parallel railroad tracks, the mainline track and the Scrivner siding. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Greenwood v. Lyles & Buckner, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Jester v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Patterson v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Pine Island RV Resort, Inc. v. Resort Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API