Legal Opinion
Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Barkett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 26, 1911No. 1137PublishedCited by 31 opinions
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by Saida Barkett against the ^Oklahoma City Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
AMES, C.
The question involved in this case is whether or not there was error in giving the following instruction : ■
“The duty of the plaintiff to use ordinary and reasonable care in crossing a railroad track is the same in degree and kind as the duty of the defendant to use ordinary and reasonable care in the operation of its cars, and even though the defendant failed to use such care, and the accident would have happened had such care been used by it, still the plaintiff cannot recover if she herself failed to use ordinary and reasonable care, and but for her failure, the accident…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Dyerson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Chunn v. City & Suburban R. Co. of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pennsylvania Co. v. SinclairIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Clark v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MastersonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.