Legal Opinion
United States v. Howell
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 10, 1965No. Civ. No. 64-269PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Defendant, West Extension Irrigation District (District), a quasi-public corporation, organized under the laws of the state of Oregon, claims, in this condemnation proceeding, a compensable interest over and above the just compensation awarded to the owners of the fee. It is admitted that six acres of the land condemned was subject to an annual assessment by the District, for operation and maintenance charges.
In support of its views, the District cites Judge Fee’s opinions in United States v. Aho, 68 F.Supp. 358 (D.Or. 1944) and United States v. Florea, 68 F.Supp. 367…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- State v. Human Relations Research FoundationWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. FloreaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
- United States v. AhoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. 129.4 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of Yuma, State of Arizona, and Fred W. Kamrath, and Unknown OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. 129.4 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1976
- California ex rel. Department of Public Works v. 25.09 Acres of LandsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971